1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 212 P.3d
  5. 212 P.3d 91 (2009)
 

PIPHER v. LOO

No. 1 CA-CV 08-0143.

212 P.3d 91 (2009)

Mark R. PIPHER, a single man, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kent C. LOO, DDS and Jane Doe Loo, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D.

March 10, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dan M. Durrant, Phoenix, and Douglas W. Holly, Cave Creek, Attorneys for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Broening Oberg Woods & Wilson PC By James R. Broening, Brian W. Purcell, Phoenix, Attorneys for Defendants-Appellees.

OPINION

IRVINE, Judge.

¶ 1 Plaintiff-Appellant Mark R. Pipher appeals from a jury verdict in favor of Defendants-Appellees Kent C. Loo, D.D.S. and Jane Doe Loo on his claim for medical malpractice. Pipher argues the trial court made erroneous and prejudicial evidentiary rulings at trial and challenges the court's award of sanctions to the Loos pursuant to Rule 68, Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure. Because we find that the trial court erred in its evidentiary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases