JOHN MAUZY PITTMAN, Judge.
The appellant was found guilty of aggravated robbery by means of a firearm and was sentenced as a habitual offender to sixty-five years' imprisonment. His sole argument for reversal is that his Fourth Amendment rights were violated by the seizure of his white ball cap and shoes, which were introduced at trial to aid in identifying appellant, and that evidence relating to these items should have been suppressed. We affirm.
On appeal...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.