LARRY D. VAUGHT, Judge.
Appellant Leland Fleming claims that his suspended sentence was erroneously revoked for non-payment of restitution based on the fact that the amount of required restitution was increased without his knowledge and express consent. He also claims that the trial court was without jurisdiction to revoke his suspended sentence. After considering the merits of his arguments, we affirm his sentence.
Fleming pled no contest to a charge of non...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.