1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 794 S.E.2d
  5. 794 S.E.2d 799 (2016)
 

O'NEAL v. INLINE FLUID POWER, INC.

No. 261PA15.

794 S.E.2d 799 (2016)

Richard O'NEAL, Employee v. INLINE FLUID POWER, INC. & Automotive Parts Co., Inc., Employer and Auto Owners Insurance Company, Carrier.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 13, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leonard T. Jernigan, Jr. , Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Kristina Brown Thompson , Attorney at Law, M. Hayes Jernigan , Attorney at Law, for O'Neal, Richard.

Viral V. Mehta , Attorney at Law, Jordan A. Benton , Attorney at Law, Carl M. Short, III , Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Inline Fluid Power, Inc. & Automotive Parts Co., Inc., et al.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Plaintiff's Petition for Discretionary Review, the Plaintiff's Petition for Discretionary Review is allowed as to issue number two only. The petition is denied as to any remaining issues. Further, Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Petition for Discretionary Review is allowed; Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Response to Motion to Amend Petition for Discretionary Review is denied.

By order of this Court in Conference, this 13

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases