1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 228 F.Supp.3d
  5. 228 F.Supp.3d 985 (2017)
 

CORDAS v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Case No. 16-cv-04065-RS.

228 F.Supp.3d 985 (2017)

Michael CORDAS, Plaintiff, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Signed January 5, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kristopher Philip Badame, Joseph Holland Hunter, Michele Eileen Pillette, Badame and Associates, APC, Lake Forest, CA, for Plaintiff.

Shon Morgan, Arthur Miles Roberts, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and Sullivan, LLP, William Lewis Stern, Claudia Maria Vetesi, Lucia X. Roibal, Tiffany Cheung, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

I. INTRODUCTION

Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Uber") moves to compel arbitration in this putative class action filed by Michael Cordas. For the reasons that follow, Uber's motion is granted.

II. BACKGROUND

In July 2015, Cordas...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases