1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 183 F.Supp.3d
  5. 183 F.Supp.3d 552 (2016)
 

ART+COM INNOVATIONPOOL GMBH v. GOOGLE INC.

Civil Action No. 14-217-RGA.

183 F.Supp.3d 552 (2016)

ART + COM INNOVATIONPOOL GMBH, Plaintiff; v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

Filed April 28, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian E. Farnan, Esq., Michael J. Farnan, Esq., Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Scott F. Partridge, Esq., C. Ryan Pinckney, Esq., Larry G. Spears, Esq., Lisa C. Kelly, Esq., Lisa M. Thomas, Esq., M. Natalie Alfaro, Esq., Michael A. Hawes, Esq. (argued), Baker Botts LLP, Houston, TX, attorneys for Plaintiff ART + COM Innovationpool GmbH.

Jack B. Blumenfeld, Esq., Paul Saindon, Esq., Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Darin W. Snyder, Esq. (argued), Luann L. Simmons, Esq., Mark Liang, Esq., Mishima Alam, Esq., John X. Zhu, Esq., David S. Almeling, Esq., O'Melveny & Myers LLP, San Francisco, CA, attorneys for Defendant Google Inc.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Presently before the Court is Defendant's motion for summary judgment for lack of patent-eligible subject matter. (D.I. 230). The issues have been fully briefed. (D.I. 231, 278, 310). Oral argument was held on March 24, 2016. (D.I. 336). For the reasons set forth herein, the motion for summary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases