TMK IPSCO et al., Plaintiffs and Consolidated Plaintiffs, and
Maverick Tube Corporation et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors and Consolidated Plaintiff-Intervenors,
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant, and
Tianjin Pipe (Group) Corp. et al., Defendant-Intervenors and Consolidated Defendant-Intervenors.
United States Court of International Trade.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Signed June 24, 2016.
Signed June 24, 2016.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Roger Brian Schagrin, Schagrin Associates, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs TMK IPSCO, V&M Star L.P., Wheatland Tube Corp., Evraz Rocky Mountain Steel, and United Steelworkers. With him on the brief was John Winthrop Bohn.
Alan Hayden Price and Robert Edward DeFrancesco, III, Wiley Rein, LLP, of Washington, DC, for consolidated plaintiff and plaintiff-intervenor Maverick Tube Corporation.
Jonathan Gordon Cooper, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for consolidated plaintiff and plaintiff-intervenor United States Steel Corporation. With him on the brief were Jon David Corey and Susan Rachael Estrich.
Loren Misha Preheim, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant United States. With him on the brief were Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Claudia Burke, Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was Shelby Mitchell Anderson, Office of the Chief Counsel for Trade Enforcement & Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, of Washington, DC.
Daniel Lewis Porter, Claudia Denise Hartleben, Matthew Paul McCullough and William Henry Barringer, Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP, of Washington, DC, for defendant-intervenors Tianjin Pipe (Group) Corp. and Tianjin Pipe International Economic & Trading Corp.
OPINION AND ORDER
Kelly, Judge:
This consolidated action comes before the court on USCIT Rule 56.2 motions for judgment on the agency record challenging the U.S. Department of Commerce's ("Department" or "Commerce") determination in the countervailing duty investigation of certain oil country tubular goods ("OCTG...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.