1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 981 F.Supp.2d
  5. 981 F.Supp.2d 217 (2013)
 

ENZO BIOCHEM, INC. v. AMERSHAM PLC

No. 02 CIV. 8448(RJS).

981 F.Supp.2d 217 (2013)

ENZO BIOCHEM, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. AMERSHAM PLC, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

October 22, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Burrows, Scott J. Borenstein, Richard C. Pettus, Jeffrey R. Mann, and John J. Elliott, of Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Avenue, New York, NY, Victor H. Polk, Jr., of Greenberg Traurig, LLP, MA, for Plaintiffs.

Maxwell Preston of Arnold & Porter LLP, Avenue, New York, NY, Matthew M. Wolf of Arnold & Porter LLP, NW, Washington, DC, and Jennifer A. Sklenar of Arnold & Porter LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Enzo Biochem, Inc. and Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. ("Enzo") bring this action for patent infringement, fraudulent inducement, breach of contract, unfair competition, and tortious interference against Defendants Amersham PLC and Amersham Biosciences ("Amersham"). On September 21, 2012, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of Amersham with respect to Enzo's patent infringement claims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases