1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 957 F.Supp.2d
  5. 957 F.Supp.2d 407 (2013)
 

HARDY v. ADAM ROSE RETIREMENT PLAN

No. 11-CV-4303 (CS).

957 F.Supp.2d 407 (2013)

Thomas HARDY, Plaintiff, v. ADAM ROSE RETIREMENT PLAN, and Adam Rose, Individually, as Plan Administrator, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

July 16, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William D. Frumkin, Elizabeth E. Hunter, Frumkin & Hunter LLP, Howard Schragin, Sapir Schragin LLP, White Plains, NY, for Plaintiff.

Leonard I. Spielberg, Harold, Salant, Strassfield & Spielberg, White Plains, NY, for Defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

SEIBEL, District Judge.

Before the Court are Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 19), and Plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 27). For the following reasons, Defendants' Motion is GRANTED and Plaintiffs Motion is DENIED.

I. BACKGROUND

The facts relevant to the disposition of the instant Motions, which are essentially not in dispute, are set forth below.

Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases