1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 900 F.Supp.2d
  5. 900 F.Supp.2d 427 (2012)
 

MICKENS v. FORD MOTOR CO.

Civ. No. 2:10-5842 (KM).

900 F.Supp.2d 427 (2012)

William MICKENS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

October 1, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David J. Cohen, Kolman Ely, P.C., Penndel, PA, for Plaintiff.

James Steven Dobis, Dobis Russell & Peterson, Livingston, NJ, for Defendant.

OPINION

KEVIN McNULTY, District Judge.

Plaintiff William Mickens, a car purchaser, brings this action individually and on behalf of others similarly situated against Ford Motor Company. The Amended Class Action Complaint (the "Complaint," cited as "AC"), contains three counts. It alleges violations of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act (the "CFA"), N.J. Stat. Ann. § 56:8-2, in connection with an alleged galvanic corrosion defect in the hood panels of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases