1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 874 F.Supp.2d
  5. 874 F.Supp.2d 889 (2012)
 

IN RE APPLE IPHONE ANTITRUST LITIGATION

No. C 11-06714 JW.

874 F.Supp.2d 889 (2012)

In re APPLE iPHONE ANTITRUST LITIGATION.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division.

July 11, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alexander H. Schmidt, Mark Carl Rifkin, Michael Milton Liskow, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, New York, NY, Betsy Carol Manifold, Francis M. Gregorek, Rachele R. Rickert, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiffs.

Christopher S. Yates, Sadik Harry Huseny, Latham & Watkins LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant.

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

JAMES WARE, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs1 bring this putative class action against Apple, Inc. ("Defendant") alleging violations of Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2. Plaintiffs allege that Defendant violated the Sherman...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases