1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 865 F.Supp.2d
  5. 865 F.Supp.2d 887 (2012)
 

BROYLES v. KASPER MACH. CO.

Case No. 3:09-cv-152.

865 F.Supp.2d 887 (2012)

Richard BROYLES, Plaintiff, v. KASPER MACHINE CO., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton.

March 30, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis Mulvihill, Lowe Eklund Wakefield & Mulvihill Co., LPA, Cincinnati, OH, Mark Lawrence Wakefield, Cleveland, OH, Richard W. Schulte, Vandalia, OH, for Plaintiff.

Forrest A. Norman, III, Paul J. Schumacher, Jr., Mark M. Turner, Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton & Norman, Cleveland, OH, Lynn V. Luther, Michael W. Regnier, Eastman & Smith Ltd., Toledo, OH, for Defendants.

ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT IAC SIDNEY, LLC, DOC. 56 AND GRANTING DEFENDANT IMS DELTAMATIC GROUP'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DOC. 82, AND TERMINATING CASE.

THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.

Pending before the Court are two motions for summary judgment, one by Plaintiff Richard Broyles's former employer, IAC Sydney, LLC, doc. 56, and one by IMS Deltamatic Group, the manufacturer of the machine upon which Broyles was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases