1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 836 F.Supp.2d
  5. 836 F.Supp.2d 1014 (2011)
 

McKINZY v. NATIONAL R.R. PASSENGER CORP.

No. C 10-1866 CW.

836 F.Supp.2d 1014 (2011)

Diane McKINZY, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, also known as Amtrak; Wilfred Hubbard; Does I through X, inclusive, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

December 23, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry D. Ammon, Attorney at Law, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiff.

Ruwani Namal Munaweera, Gary T. Lafayette, Lafayette & Kumagai LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 48); DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY (Docket No. 56); AND DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO MODIFY THE COURT'S PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER (Docket No. 81)

CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.

Defendants National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) and Wilfred Hubbard seek summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment in their favor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases