1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 820 F.Supp.2d
  5. 820 F.Supp.2d 1141 (2011)
 

U.S. v. AL BAHLUL

No. CMCR 09-001.

820 F.Supp.2d 1141 (2011)

UNITED STATES of America v. Ali Hamza Ahmad Suliman AL BAHLUL.

United States Court of Military Commission Review.

September 9, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Colonel Peter E. Brownback, III, JA, U.S. Army was the military commission judge through arraignment, and Colonel Ronald A. Gregory, U.S. Air Force, was the military commission judge for trial.

Michel Paradis argued the cause for appellant. With him on briefs were Major Todd E. Pierce, JA, U.S. Army, and Captain Mary McCormick, JAGC, U.S. Navy.

Captain Edward S. White, JAGC, U.S. Navy argued the cause for appellee. With him on briefs were Captain John F. Murphy, JAGC, U.S. Navy and Francis A. Gilligan.

Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for Robert David Steele and others in the U.S. Intelligence Community by McKenzie A. Livingston; for the National Institute of Military Justice, Human Rights Watch, Professor Stephen I. Vladeck and Professor David S. Weissbrodt by Victor M. Hansen, Geoffrey S. Corn, and Michelle M. Lindo McCluer; for the Montana Pardon Project, Clemens P. Work, and University of Montana Criminal Defense Clinic by Jeffrey T. Renz, assisted by law student Dylan McFarland; for the Historians, Political Scientists, and Constitutional Law Scholars by Sarah H. Paoletti; for the Human Rights Committee of the American Branch of the International Law Association by Jordan J. Paust, for the Office of the Chief Defense Counsel by Colonel Peter R. Masciola, U.S. Air Force and Adam Thurschwell, and for the National Congress of American Indians by John H. Dossett.

BEFORE THE COURT EN BANC, BRAND, PRICE, SIMS, GALLAGHER, PERLAK, ORR, Appellate Military Judges.

PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT

PRICE, Judge:

   I. INTRODUCTION.........................................................1155

  II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY...................................................1155

 III. JURISDICTIONAL BASIS FOR REVIEW......................................1157

  IV. ISSUES ON APPEAL.....................................................1158
      A. Result of Court...

                    
                    
                    

                        

                            

                                
                            

                            

                                

                                    
    
                                        
  1. 
                                        
  2. 
                                        
  3. 
                                    

                                

                                

                                    
Let's get started

                                

                                

                                    

                                    Leagle.com
                                    

                                    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting 
                                    

                                        Sign on now to see your case. 
                                        

                                        Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
                                        

                                        
    
                                            
  • Updated daily.
    • 
                                            
  • Uncompromising quality.
    • 
                                            
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.
    •

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases