PALL CORP. v. 3M PURIFICATION INC.

Nos. CV 97-7599(RRM)(ETB), CV 03-0092(RRM)(ETB).

764 F.Supp.2d 478 (2011)

PALL CORPORATION, Plaintiff(s), v. 3M PURIFICATION INC., Defendant(s).

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

February 10, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nixon Peabody LLP, by Joseph J. Ortego, Esq., James W. Weller, Esq., Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd., by H. Michael Hartmann, Esq., Paul J. Korniczky, Esq., Kirkland & Ellis LLP, by Garret A. Leach, Esq., Paul R. Garcia, Esq., Michael I. Cohen, Esq., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff.


ORDER

BOYLE, United States Magistrate Judge:

By application dated January 24, 2011, the defendant, 3M Purification Inc. ("3M"), sought leave to file its "fully-briefed Renewed Motion for Sanctions"—consisting of approximately 1,400 pages-under seal, on the grounds that it contains information that the plaintiff, Pall Corporation ("Pall"), has designated as confidential under the parties' protective order. On January 28, 2011, the Court directed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases