1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 689 F.Supp.2d
  5. 689 F.Supp.2d 910 (2010)
 

VALENTE v. UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON

Case No. 3:08-cv-225.

689 F.Supp.2d 910 (2010)

John T. VALENTE, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton.

January 4, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Valente, Dayton, OH, pro se.

Jennifer Nicole Fuller, Paul Gerard Hallinan, Dayton, OH, for Defendant.

DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

MICHAEL R. MERZ, United States Magistrate Judge.

This case is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 123), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 137) and Defendant's Reply Memorandum in Support (Doc. No. 141).

SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD

Summary judgment is proper "if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases