1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 291 P.3d
  5. 291 P.3d 991 (2013)
 

BRADSHAW v. JASSO-BARAJAS

No. 1 CA-CV 12-0085.

291 P.3d 991 (2013)

Andrew BRADSHAW, individually, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Maricela JASSO-BARAJAS, Defendant/Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

January 8, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Office of Robert B. Stanewich by Robert B. Stanewich, Phoenix, Attorney for Defendant/Appellant.

Phillips & Lyon, P.L.C. by Jack H. Hirsch, Phoenix, Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appellee.

OPINION

PORTLEY, Judge.

¶ 1 We are asked to decide whether the trial court erred by awarding attorneys' fees to plaintiff/appellee Andrew Bradshaw pursuant to Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure ("Rule") 77(f) without first deducting Rule 68(g) sanctions from the verdict. Because the court properly interpreted and applied both rules, we affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 The facts are undisputed. After a car...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases