The court correctly found that, by checking two different political party affiliations on his application to register as a new voter in the City of New York, petitioner failed to enroll in any party (Election Law § 5-302 [3]). We reject petitioner's argument that respondent should have enrolled him in the party in which he had previously been enrolled, in Nassau County (see Election Law §§ 5-208 [4]; 5-304 [4]; Matter of Coopersmith v Ortutay,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF DIETL v. BOARD OF ELECTIONS IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
4398. 100082/17.
151 A.D.3d 504 (2017)
2017 NY Slip Op 04573
53 N.Y.S.3d 545
In the Matter of RICHARD DIETL, Appellant, v. BOARD OF ELECTIONS IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 8, 2017.
Decided June 8, 2017.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.