1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 728 F.3d
  5. 728 F.3d 682 (2013)
 

IRA HOLTZMAN, C.P.A. v. TURZA

Nos. 11-3188, 11-3746.

728 F.3d 682 (2013)

IRA HOLTZMAN, C.P.A., & Associates Limited, individually and as representative of a class, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory P. TURZA, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided August 26, 2013.

Rehearing Denied September 24, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Phillip A. Bock (submitted), Attorney, Bock & Hatch, Chicago, IL, Brian J. Wanca , Anderson & Wanca Rolling Meadows, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Steven D. Pearson (submitted), Attorney, Meckler Bulger Tilson Marick & Pearson LLP, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and WILLIAMS and TINDER, Circuit Judges.

EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge.

Believing that CPAs would find his services attractive, attorney Gregory Turza sent more than 200 of them occasional fax sheets containing business advice. The faxes produced more business — but not for Turza. He became the defendant in this suit under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, 47 U.S.C. § 227, which prohibits any person from sending unsolicited fax advertisements. Even when the Act permits fax ads —...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases