1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 908 F.3d
  5. 908 F.3d 690 (2018)
 

GOPRO, INC. v. CONTOUR IP HOLDING LLC.

2017-1894, 2017-1936.

908 F.3d 690 (2018)

GOPRO, INC., Appellant v. CONTOUR IP HOLDING LLC, Appellee

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Opinion Modified: November 1, 2018

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

MARK A. LEMLEY, Durie Tangri LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by ADAM R. BRAUSA; KARINEH KHACHATOURIAN, Rimon, P.C., Palo Alto, CA.

PAUL MICHAEL SCHOENHARD, McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by IAN BARNETT BROOKS, NICOLE JANTZI.

Before Reyna, Wallach, and Hughes, Circuit Judges.

GoPro, Inc. appeals from final written decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in two inter partes review proceedings. In the proceedings, the Board found that the petitioner, GoPro, did not demonstrate that the challenged claims are unpatentable as obvious. The Board based this decision on its conclusion that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases