1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 608 F.Supp.3d
  5. 608 F.Supp.3d 541 (2022)
 

HARRISON PROSTHETIC CRADLE v. ROE DENTAL LAB.

Case No. 1:22-cv-00341.

608 F.Supp.3d 541 (2022)

HARRISON PROSTHETIC CRADLE INC., Plaintiff v. ROE DENTAL LABORATORY, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

Signed June 17, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew S. Curfman, James F. McCarthy, III, Joseph A. Sebolt, Howard L. Wernow, Sand, Sebolt & Wernow, Canton, OH, for Plaintiff.

Bruce G. Chapman, Karish & Bjorgum, Pasadena, CA, Frank J. Witschey, Karan A. Moss, Witschey Witschey & Firestine, Akron, OH, for Defendant ROE Dental Laboratory, Inc.

Bruce G. Chapman, Karish & Bjorgum, Pasadena, CA, Frank J. Witschey, Witschey Witschey & Firestine, Akron, OH, for Defendant Watson Guide IP LLC.

Bruce G. Chapman, Karish & Bjorgum, Pasadena, CA, for Defendant Chrome Guided Systems.

OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff Harrison Prosthetic Cradle Inc. brought this action for patent infringement against three named Defendants: (1) Roe Dental Laboratory, Inc., (2) Watson Guide IP LLC, and (3) Chrome Guided Systems. It also names as Defendants various John...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases