1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 547 F.Supp.3d
  5. 547 F.Supp.3d 769 (2021)
 

CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. VERTIV SERVICES

Case No. 2:20-cv-4880.

547 F.Supp.3d 769 (2021)

CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, other The Markley Group, Plaintiff, v. VERTIV SERVICES, INC., now known as Vertiv Corporation, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

Filed July 1, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John C. DeSimone, John B. DiSciullo, Mitchell & DeSimone, Boston, MA, Michael R. Traven, Robert B. Graziano, FisherBroyles, LLP, Columbus, OH, Stephen M. Winning, Pro Hac Vice, Dugan, Brinkmann, Maginnis and Pace, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff.

Marc J. Kessler, Hahn Loeser & Parks, Columbus, OH, Nathaniel R. B. Koslof, Sullivan & Worcester LLP, Boston, MA, Sarah K. Dunkley, Pro Hac Vice, Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP, Chicago, IL, for Defendant Vertiv Services, Inc.

D. Patrick Kasson, Thomas N. Spyker, Reminger Co., LPA, Columbus, OH, for Defendant SBE, Inc.

D. Patrick Kasson, Reminger Co., LPA, Columbus, OH, for Defendants SB Electronics, Advanced Power Conversion Solutions.

OPINION AND ORDER

Defendant Vertiv Services, Inc. ("Vertiv") moves for a partial judgement on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). Mot., ECF No. 42. For the following reasons, Defendant's motion is DENIED.

I. FACTS

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases