INVENERGY RENEWABLES LLC, Plaintiff, and
Solar Energy Industries Association, Clearway Energy Group LLC, EDF Renewables, Inc. and AES Distributed Energy, Inc., Plaintiff-Intervenors,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Office of the United States Trade Representative, United States Trade Representative Robert E. Lighthizer, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection Mark A. Morgan, Defendants, and
Hanwha Q Cells USA, Inc. and Auxin Solar, Inc., Defendant-Intervenors.
United States Court of International Trade.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 27, 2020.
May 27, 2020.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Amanda Shafer Berman, John Brew, Kathryn L. Clune, Amanda Shafer Berman, and Larry Eisenstat, Crowell & Moring LLP, of Washington, DC and New York, NY, argued for plaintiff, Invenergy Renewables LLC and plaintiff-intervenors, Clearway Energy Group LLC and AES Distributed Energy, Inc. With them on the briefs was Frances Hadfield.
Matthew R. Nicely and Daniel M. Witkowski, Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-intervenor, Solar Energy Industries Association. With them on the briefs were Dean A. Pinkert and Julia K. Eppard.
Kevin M. O'Brien and Christine M. Streatfeild, Baker & McKenzie LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-intervenor, EDF Renewables, Inc.
Stephen C. Tosini, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants. With him on the brief were Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Tara K. Hogan, Assistant Director.
John M. Gurley, Dianna Dimitriuc-Quaia, and Friederike S. Görgens, Arent Fox LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-intervenors, Hanwha Q CELLS USA, Inc. and Auxin Solar Inc.
OPINION
Katzmann, Judge:
In this hotly contested litigation arising from the solar industry, the court returns to its order preliminarily enjoining the United States and the Office of the United States Trade Representative ("USTR") from withdrawing its previously granted exclusion from safeguard duties on imported...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
