In No. 73-1069, probable jurisdiction is noted limited to Question 2 presented by the jurisdictional statement which reads as follows:
"2. Whether in reversing the Commission's decision awarding certificates of public convenience and necessity the District Court employed erroneous standards of judicial review and improperly substituted its judgment for that of the agency."
Case is consolidated and a total of one and one-half hours allotted for...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.