1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 394 U.S.
  5. 394 U.S. 902 (1969)
 

BRUNDAGE v. U.S.

No. 942.

394 U.S. 902 (1969)

BRUNDAGE ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

March 10, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert W. Ginnane, Fritz R. Kahn, and Jerome Nelson for the Interstate Commerce Commission on motion to advance and to dispense with printing appendix. Hugh B. Cox, Ray Garrett, D. Robert Thomas, Lee B. McTurnan, Anthony Kane, Louis E. Torinus, Earl F. Requa, Frank S. Farrell, Eldon Martin, and Richard J. Flynn for Great Northern Railway Co. et al. on motion to advance. Louis B. Dailey and Harry Tyson Carter for appellants Brundage et al. in opposition to motion to advance.

Motion of certain appellees to advance and to dispense with printing appendix denied. MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases