REDRUP v. NEW YORK

No. 72.

384 U.S. 916 (1966)

REDRUP v. NEW YORK.

Supreme Court of United States.

April 25, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Osmond K. Fraenkel, Stanley Fleishman and Sam Rosenwein for petitioner. Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for respondent.


Certiorari granted limited to Question 4 presented by the petition which reads as follows:

"4. Whether, consistent with the due process requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment and the constitutional standards for judging obscenity enunciated by the Supreme Court, a judgment of conviction can be rendered against an accused without proof in the record that the accused knew the contents of the material or believed that the material involved violated the law, and where...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases