1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 377 U.S.
  5. 377 U.S. 926 (1964)
 

U.S. v. CALIFORNIA

No. 5, Original.

377 U.S. 926 (1964)

UNITED STATES v. CALIFORNIA.

Supreme Court of United States.

May 18, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Solicitor General Cox for the United States. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, for defendant. Movant pro se. Solicitor General Cox for the United States in opposition to the motion for leave to file petition for intervention. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California and Howard S. Goldin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of California in opposition to motion for leave to file petition for intervention and for leave to file brief as amicus curiae.

The joint application for an extension of time for filing answering briefs and for allowance of time for filing reply briefs is granted. Answering briefs shall be filed on or before June 15, 1964, and reply briefs shall be filed on or before July 30, 1964. The motion of Carl Whitson for leave to file a petition for intervention is denied but the alternative motion for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted. THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE CLARK took...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases