Certiorari granted. Counsel are directed to discuss in their briefs and oral arguments, among other questions, the question whether the amendment of a "Return Order," as opposed to a "Notice of Intention to Return," is permissible, under the pertinent regulations or otherwise, and, if not, the effect of such an amendment on the pertinent limitations period.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
LEGERLOTZ v. ROGERS
No. 213.
361 U.S. 808 (1959)
LEGERLOTZ v. ROGERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL.
Supreme Court of United States.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 12, 1959.
October 12, 1959.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Supreme Court of United States.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.