1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 350 U.S.
  5. 350 U.S. 1003 (1956)
 

RIVERBANK LABORATORIES v. HARDWOOD PRODUCTS CORP.

No. 66.

350 U.S. 1003 (1956)

RIVERBANK LABORATORIES v. HARDWOOD PRODUCTS CORP.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 2, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maurice Rosenfield argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Philip B. Kurland and Jack H. Oppenheim. David A. Fox argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Gerrit P. Groen and Roger Sherman Hoar.

Per Curiam.

The Court is of the opinion that the District Court correctly found there was proper service upon the defendant in this case. Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to that Court for further proceedings.* MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases