1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 350 U.S.
  5. 350 U.S. 926 (1956)
 

BOSTON & PROVIDENCE RAILROAD CORPORATION STOCKHOLDERS v. NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD CO.

No. 437.

350 U.S. 926 (1956)

BOSTON & PROVIDENCE RAILROAD CORPORATION STOCKHOLDERS v. NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD CO. ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 9, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Armistead B. Rood, Joseph B. Hyman, Cassius M. Clay and Sidney H. Willner for appellants. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Robert W. Ginnane and Isaac K. Hay for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and William T. Griffin and Herbert Burstein for the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co., appellees.

Per Curiam.

The motion of Boston & Providence Railroad Corporation Stockholders Committee for leave to intervene or, in the alternative, to file brief as amicus curiae is denied. The motion to affirm are granted and the judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases