Supreme Court of United States.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 28, 1955.
February 28, 1955.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Ross F. Jones, Attorney General, Howard F. Thompson, Special Assistant Attorney General, John H. Moeur, Burr Sutter, Theodore Kiendl and Perry M. Ling for the State of Arizona, complainant. Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, Northcutt Ely, Robert L. McCarty, Prentiss Moore and Gilbert F. Nelson, Assistant Attorneys General, and Charles E. Corker and Burton J. Gindler, Deputy Attorneys General, for the State of California, Francis E. Jenney for the Palo Verde Irrigation District, Harry W. Horton and R.L. Knox, Jr. for the Imperial Irrigation District, Earl Redwin for the Coachella Valley County Water District, James H. Howard, Charles C. Cooper, Jr., Donald M. Keith, Alan Patten and Frank P. Doherty for the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Roger Arnebergh for the City of Los Angeles, and T.B. Cosgrove for the City of San Diego, defendants. Harvey Dickerson, Attorney General, William N. Dunseath and John W. Barrett, Deputy Attorneys General, W.T. Mathews and William J. Kane, Special Assistant Attorneys General, and H.W. Edwards for the State of Nevada, intervener. Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General, and Hatfield Chilson, Special Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Colorado, and Howard B. Black, Attorney General, for the State of Wyoming. Richard Robinson, Attorney General, and Fred E. Wilson, Special Assistant Attorney General, for the State of New Mexico. E.R. Callister, Attorney General, and Ken Chamberlain, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Utah.
Supreme Court of United States.
The motion of California defendants for leave to file an amended answer is granted. The motion to join as parties the States of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming is hereby referred to George I. Haight, Special Master, to hear the parties and report with all convenient speed his opinion and recommendation as to whether the motion should be granted. THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
