COXE v. McCLENACHAN

Not in source.

3 U.S. 478 (1798)

3 Dall. 478

1 L.Ed. 687

COXE, v. McCLENACHAN. COXE, v. HUSTON, special bail.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

December 1, 1798.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ingersoll and Dallas contended.

E. Tilghman and Ross, the Plaintiff's counsel.


JUDGMENT having been obtained against M'Clenachan, a Ca. Sa. issued to September Term last, and was returned non est inventus. The Plaintiff then issued a scire facias against Huston, the special bail, which was returnable to the present term; and within the first four days of the term M'Clenachan was surrendered in discharge of his bail, when a motion was made for leave to enter an exoneretur. But the Defendant, being a member of the Congress, which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases