ROYAL CADILLAC SERVICE, INC. v. U.S.

No. 423.

317 U.S. 595 (1942)

ROYAL CADILLAC SERVICE, INC. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

November 9, 1942.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. George H. Rosen for appellants. Solicitor General Fahy and Mr. Daniel W. Knowlton for the United States et al.; Mr. Henry P. Goldstein for the Mountain Transit Corporation; and Mr. James F.X. O'Brien for the Hudson Transit Lines, — appellees.


Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed, it appearing that the only substantial question raised by the appeal — whether under § 206 (a) of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C., § 306 (a), appellants may lawfully continue operation until the determination by the Commission of their application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity — has become moot because of the denial of such application...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases