The indictment was drawn in four counts to meet all possible turns of the evidence at the trial, in order that so far as possible a variance might be avoided. The jury's verdict on this indictment is plainly to be interpreted as their statement that they were not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that any particular named defendant held the gun, but that they were convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that some one of the three defendants did hold the gun.
But even...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.