HYUNDAI STEEL CO. v. U.S.

Court No. 16-00161 Slip Op. 18-2.

282 F.Supp.3d 1332 (2018)

HYUNDAI STEEL CO., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, AK Steel Corp., Arcelormittal USA LLC, California Steel Indus., Inc., Nucor Corp., Steel Dynamics, Inc., and United States Steel Corp. Defendant-Intervenors.

United States Court of International Trade.

Dated: January 10, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. David Park, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs. With him on the brief were Andrew Treaster, Daniel Wilson, Henry Almond, and Sylvia Yun Chu Chen.

Elizabeth Speck, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant. Of counsel on the brief was James Ahrens II, Office of Chief Counsel for Trade Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, of Washington, DC.

Grace Kim, Joshua Morey, Kathleen Cannon, Paul Rosenthal, and R. Alan Luberda, Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP, of Washington, DC, for defendant-intervenor ArcelorMittal USA LLC.

Roger Schagrin, Christopher Cloutier, John Bohn, and Paul Jameson, Schagrin Associates, of Washington, DC, for defendant-intervenors Steel Dynamics, Inc. and California Steel Industries, Inc.

Stephen Jones, and Daniel Schneiderman, King & Spalding, LLP, of Washington, DC, for defendant-intervenor AK Steel Corporation.

Luke Meisner, Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-intervenor United States Steel Corporation. With him on the brief was Jeffrey Gerrish.

Alan Price, Adam Teslik, Christopher Weld, Cynthia Galvez, Derick Holt, Laura El-Sabaawi, Maureen Thorson, Stephanie Bell, Tessa Capeloto, Timothy Brightbill, and Usha Neelakantan, Wiley Rein, LLP, of Washington, DC, for defendant-intervenor Nucor Corporation.


OPINION

In this action challenging a United States Department of Commerce ("Commerce") Antidumping Duty Investigation Determination regarding Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products ("CORE") from Korea, Hyundai Steel Co. ("Hyundai") requests that the court hold the final determination unsupported by substantial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases