1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 278 U.S.
  5. 278 U.S. 575 (1928)
 

WICK v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. 87.

278 U.S. 575 (1928)

WICK ET AL. v. SUPERIOR COURT ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 10, 1928.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph D. Sullivan for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. F.G. Dorety, Frank T. Post, Edwin C. Matthias, Charles S. Albert, and Thomas Balmer for defendants in error.

Per Curiam.

The writ of error is dismissed on the authority of § 237 (a) of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937), because the judgment sought to be reviewed is not final within the meaning of this section, however it may be regarded in state procedure; Grays Harbor Logging Co. v. Coates Fordney Logging Co., 243 U.S. 251; Washington ex rel. McPherson Bros. Co. v....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases