CONNER v. BARTLETT

No. 176.

273 U.S. 661 (1927)

WILLIE CONNER AND JOHN CONNER v. H.U. BARTLETT, E.G. BAILEY, McMANN OIL COMPANY, ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 21, 1927.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. W.H. Francis, B.B. Blakeney, and L.O. Lytle for defendants in error, in support of the motion. Mr. William Neff for plaintiffs in error, in opposition thereto.


Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U.S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U.S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U.S. 144

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases