SNITOW v. WISSING

No. 842.

264 U.S. 600 (1924)

SOL D. SNITOW v. HARRY L. WISSING, TRUSTEE.

Supreme Court of United States.

April 14, 1924.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Charles Hershenstein and Mr. Samuel Hershenstein for petitioner. Mr. Samuel Conrad Cohen for respondent.


Petition dismissed, per stipulation.

APPENDIX.

In Davis v. Portland Seed Co., ante, p. 403, Mr. John F. Finerty, as counsel for Davis, Agent etc. and Director General of Railroads, took a position respecting important questions involved differing from that advanced by counsel representing the railroads. The following summary is taken from his supplemental briefs.

1. Under any and all...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases