1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 662 F.Supp.2d
  5. 662 F.Supp.2d 1006 (2009)
 

SE-KURE CONTROLS, INC. v. DIAM USA, INC.

No. 06 C 4857.

662 F.Supp.2d 1006 (2009)

SE-KURE CONTROLS, INC., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. DIAM USA, INC., Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, POP Displays, USA, LLC (successor in interest to Diam, USA, Inc.), Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Telefonix, Inc., Third-Party Defendant, Telefonix, Inc., Cross-Claim Plaintiff, v. Se-Kure Controls, Inc. Cross-Claim Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

September 18, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Daniel Harris, Cameron Matthew Nelson, Herbert H. Finn, James J. Lukas, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant.

Lee F. Grossman, Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro, Mark M. Grossman, Grossman Law Offices, Joel Matthew Koppenhoefer, Dykema Gossett PLLC, Chicago, IL, for Defendant and Third-Party Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RONALD A. GUZMAN, District Judge.

Se-Kure Controls, Inc. ("Se-Kure") has sued Diam USA, Inc. ("Diam") for infringement of U.S. Patent No. RE37,590 E ("the '590 Patent"). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ("Rule") 56, defendants Diam; Pop Displays USA, LLC ("POP Displays"); and third-party defendant Telefonix, Inc. ("Telefonix") (collectively hereinafter ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases