1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 632 F.Supp.2d
  5. 632 F.Supp.2d 956 (2009)
 

AMERICAN PILEDRIVING EQUIPMENT v. BAY MACHINERY

No. C 08-1934 PJH.

632 F.Supp.2d 956 (2009)

AMERICAN PILEDRIVING EQUIPMENT, INC., Plaintiff, v. BAY MACHINERY CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

June 12, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig J. Madson, Madson & Austin, P.C., Farmington, UT, Jeffrey L. Fillerup, Andrew Sasan Azarmi, Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff.

Ina Doung-May Chang, Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P., Matthew James Vanis, Mia Ottilia Solvesson, Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P., San Francisco, CA, Kenneth Paul Kula, Peter C. Knops, Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP, Kansas City, MO, for Defendant.

ORDER CONSTRUING CLAIMS

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.

On May 6, 2009, the parties' claim construction hearing to construe the disputed terms of U.S. Patent No. 5,355,964 ("the '964 Patent") pursuant to Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 U.S. 370, 116 S.Ct. 1384, 134 L.Ed.2d 577 (1996), came on before this court. Plaintiff American Piledriving Equipment, Inc. ("APE") appeared through its counsel Craig...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases