1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 659 F.Supp.2d
  5. 659 F.Supp.2d 784 (2009)
 

HAMMOND v. PEARLE VISION, INC.

Civil Action No. 5:07-CV-78.

659 F.Supp.2d 784 (2009)

David J. HAMMOND, O.D., Plaintiff, v. PEARLE VISION, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Texarkana Division.

March 17, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark C. Burgess, Mark Brandon Duch, Boyd Poff & Burgess, LLP, Texarkana, TX, Hector A. Canales, J.A. Canales, Canales & Simonson PC, Corpus Christi, TX, for Plaintiff.

Alan Neil Greenspan, Jeremy Todd Brown, Jackson Walker, Dallas, TX, Lori A. Schechter, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant.

ORDER

DAVID FOLSOM, District Judge.

Before the Court is Pearle's Objection (Dkt. No. 82) to Magistrate Judge Craven's Report and Recommendations ("Limitations R & R") (Dkt. No. 81) denying Pearle's Motion for Summary Judgment on Limitations (Dkt. No. 24). Also before the Court are Hammond's Objections (Dkt. No. 88) to Magistrate Judge Craven's Report and Recommendations (Dkt. No. 84) granting in part and denying in part Pearle's Motion for Summary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases