KUCHER v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP.


20 Misc.3d 64 (2008)

864 N.Y.S.2d 660

BARRY E. KUCHER, Appellant-Respondent, v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP., Respondent-Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

July 2, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sadis & Goldberg, LLP, New York City (Francis Bigelow, Douglas R. Hirsch, Jarret Kahn and David Kasell of counsel), for appellant-respondent.

Rose Law Firm, PLLC, Albany (Justin E. Proper of counsel), for respondent-appellant.

WESTON PATTERSON, J.P., and RIOS, J., concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

On the court's own motion, the notices of appeal from the amended order entered May 16, 2006, are deemed applications for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see CCA 1702 [c]).

Amended order, insofar as appealed from by plaintiff, reversed without costs, the provision determining that plaintiff's entitlement to relief as against defendant DaimlerChrysler...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases