1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 580 F.Supp.2d
  5. 580 F.Supp.2d 40 (2008)
 

RAMEY v. POTOMAC ELEC. POWER CO.

Civil Action No. 07-2132(RJL).

580 F.Supp.2d 40 (2008)

Benjamin RAMEY, Plaintiff, v. POTOMAC ELEC. POWER CO., Defendant. Benjamin Ramey, Plaintiff, v. Potomac Elec. Power Co., Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

September 25, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benjamin Ramey, Washington, DC, pro se.

Connie Nora Bertram, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge.

Plaintiff Benjamin Ramey filed two pro se complaints against his former employer, the Potomac Electric Power Company ("PEPCO"). Because the claims are barred by the doctrine of claim preclusion, sometimes known as res judicata, they will be dismissed pursuant to the Court's authority sua sponte to screen pro se complaints, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), and to apply the doctrine of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases