1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 176 P.3d
  5. 176 P.3d 430 (2008)
 

VANCE v. TEPLICK

040909551; A130844.

176 P.3d 430 (2008)

217 Or. App. 571

Dorothy B. Smith VANCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stanley B. TEPLICK, MD, and Center for Sight-Oregon, PC, an Oregon corporation, Defendants-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 30, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert K. Udziela, Portland, argued the cause and filed the reply brief for appellant. With him on the opening brief was Lawrence Baron,

Jay W. Beattie, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Lindsay, Hart, Neil & Weigler, LLP.

Before SCHUMAN, Presiding Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge, and COLLINS, Judge pro tempore.

COLLINS, J. pro tempore.

Plaintiff in this medical malpractice case appeals a judgment after a jury verdict for defendants Stanley B. Teplick, N.D., and Center for Sight-Oregon, PC, on her claims that defendants were negligent and failed to obtain her informed consent for surgeries performed on her eyes. On appeal, she argues that the trial court erred in refusing to give one of her proposed jury instructions, in refusing to require the jury to take all of the exhibits...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases