1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 47 A.D.3d
  5. 47 A.D.3d 459 (2008)
 

BARBUL v. MATSIA PROPERTIES, CORP.

47 A.D.3d 459 (2008)

849 N.Y.S.2d 523

RUZA BARBUL et al., Appellants, v. MATSIA PROPERTIES, CORP., Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided January 15, 2008.

The trial court properly precluded plaintiffs' expert from referring to the New York City Building Code (Administrative Code of City of NY tit 27), since there was no proof of the year the subject building and ramp were constructed and thus no foundation for the applicability of different versions of the Code and its individual provisions (Ross v Manhattan Chelsea Assoc., 194 A.D.2d 332, 333 [1993]). In any event, the expert testified...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases