The court properly exercised its discretion in declining to run defendant's sentence nunc pro tunc to the date of his arrest in another county. Defendant did not preserve his claim that he was entitled to that remedy as a matter of law on the ground that, by failing to have him produced in a timely fashion, the People violated his right under CPL 380.30 (1) to be sentenced without unreasonable delay (see People v Marshall,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
