The People met their burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, risk factors bearing a sufficient total point score to support a level three sex offender adjudication. Since the victim's grand jury testimony, standing alone, clearly established that defendant used a dangerous instrument during the rape, the court properly assessed points under the corresponding risk factor (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Quintana,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. IMBERT
48 A.D.3d 297 (2008)
850 N.Y.S.2d 899
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDGAR IMBERT, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 19, 2008.
Decided February 19, 2008.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.