1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 951 A.2d
  5. 951 A.2d 970 (2008)
 

AMERADA HESS CORP. v. BURLINGTON COUNTY PLANNING BOARD

A-41 September Term 2007

951 A.2d 970 (2008)

195 N.J. 616

AMERADA HESS CORPORATION, now known as Hess Corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BURLINGTON COUNTY PLANNING BOARD, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 16, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony T. Drollas, Jr., Trenton, argued the cause for appellant (Capehart Scatchard, attorneys).

Donna M. Jennings, Woodbridge, argued the cause for respondent (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys).

Justice LONG delivered the opinion of the Court.

At issue on this appeal is the meaning of N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.7, a provision of the County Planning Act (CPA) that directs that a completed land use application is automatically deemed approved if the county planning board fails to take official action within thirty days, or within sixty days if both the municipal planning board and the applicant consent. There is no provision in the CPA for an extension of those...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases