1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 588 F.Supp.2d
  5. 588 F.Supp.2d 1240 (2008)
 

QR SPEX, INC. v. MOTOROLA INC.

Case No. SACV 07-00987 CJC (RNBx).

588 F.Supp.2d 1240 (2008)

QR SPEX, INC., Plaintiff v. MOTOROLA INC., Oakley Inc., Oakley Sales Corp., and Oakley Direct, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California, Southern Division.

December 4, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ayesha Najam, Mark A. Giugliano, Matthew D. Cooper, Phillip T. Bruns, Gibbs and Bruns, LLP, Houston, TX, Jan P. Weir, Monique Heyninck, Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, Newport Beach, CA, Jennifer A. Trusso, Steven M. Hanle, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Costa Mesa, CA, John Edward Dowdell, William W. O'Connor, Norman Wohlgemuth Chandler and Dowdell, Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiff.

Gregory K. Nelson, Gregory L. Weeks, Janet Robertson Kaufman, Weeks Kaufman Nelson and Johnson, Solana Beach, CA, for Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff QR Spex Inc. ("QR Spex") alleges that Defendants Motorola Inc., Oakley Inc., Oakley Sales Corp., and Oakley Direct, Inc. (collectively "Oakley") are infringing its United States Patent No. 6,769,767 (the "'767 Patent"). Specifically, QR Spex alleges that two pairs of Oakley Eyewear—the O ROKR and the 0 ROKR Pro (collectively "Oakley Eyewear"...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases