1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 557 F.Supp.2d
  5. 557 F.Supp.2d 1051 (2008)
 

ATMEL CORP. v. AUTHENTEC, INC.

Nos. C 06-2138 CW, C 07-3331 CW.

557 F.Supp.2d 1051 (2008)

ATMEL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; Atmel Switzerland, a corporation; Atmel France, a corporation; Atmel Sari, a corporation, Plaintiffs, v. AUTHENTEC, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

May 5, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Denise L. Mckenzie, Attorney at Law, Edward Gerard Poplawski, Franklin Devin Kang, Olivia M. Kim, Sidley Austin LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs.

Henry C. Bunsow, Denise M. De Mory, Howrey LLP, Brian A. E. Smith, Howrey, Simon, Arnold & White, Courtney Towle, Keker & Van Nest, LLP, Ethan B. Andelman, NXP Semiconductors, Matthew Greinert, Attorney at Law, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant.

ORDER ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Atmel Corporation, Atmel Switzerland, Atmel France and Atmel SARL and Defendant Authentec, Inc. dispute the meaning of several terms and phrases used in U.S. Patent No. 6,289,114 (the '114 patent) and U.S. Patent No. 6,459,804 (the '804 patent). Plaintiffs and Defendant each ask the Court to adopt their proposed construction of the disputed terms...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases